http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/7183298/santonio-holmes-numbers-done-year-unhappy-role FLORHAM PARK, N.J. -- The New York Jets' No. 1 priority in free agency was to re-sign Santonio Holmes, and they accomplished that by making him one of the highest-paid wide receivers -- $45 million over five years. After seven games, Holmes' numbers are pedestrian, leading to speculation that he's disgruntled with his role. He didn't exactly throw water on that smoldering issue Wednesday. Asked point-blank whether he's happy, the outspoken receiver replied: "We're here winning ballgames right now." And that was that. It's not hard to read between the lines on that one. Holmes has only 22 receptions, his least productive seven-game stretch since the start of his rookie year with the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2006. More alarming is the lack of opportunities. He has been targeted only 41 times, third on the team and tied for 46th among wide receivers, according to ESPN Stats & Information. Holmes was careful not to openly complain about not getting the ball, perhaps because he was hauled into Rex Ryan's office three weeks ago after criticizing the offensive line, sparking a war of words with teammate Brandon Moore. But there's no doubt that Holmes is frustrated, according to people close to him. "We're 4-3 right now, and that's pretty much all I could ask for up to this point," said Holmes, forgetting about 5-2, 6-1 or 7-0. "I have -- what? -- four touchdowns. That's a pretty good ratio, 22 catches, four touchdowns. It fits well in my book right now." Actually, he has three touchdowns. He almost had a fourth in the Jets' last game, a 27-21 win over the San Diego Chargers, but a diving catch in the end zone was nullified by a penalty. The Jets' receiving corps provides plenty of soap-opera material. There was the Holmes-Moore spat, the sudden and curious trade of Derrick Mason, and the conspicuously slow start by Plaxico Burress. Burress responded with three touchdowns against the Chargers, shifting the spotlight to Holmes, who's still waiting for his breakout game. He opened with a six-catch, 70-yard game against the Dallas Cowboys, but his production has since declined. Over the past three games, he's caught as many balls (nine) as rookie Jeremy Kerley. There was a report last week that said Holmes was unhappy, but he claimed he wasn't aware of it. Ryan seemed bemused when asked about Holmes, knowing that only two weeks ago he was getting the same questions about Burress. "I understand the numbers," Ryan said. "The great thing about Tone is, he never gets caught up in the numbers. If you ask anybody in the league who the top receivers are, his name will always come up because that's who he is. He's an explosive guy, and I'd love to see him catch more balls, there's no doubt." Obviously, a lot of it falls on Mark Sanchez, who still is struggling with his accuracy. He has completed only 55.8 percent of his passes, 28th in the league. Sanchez has a few mouths to feed -- don't forget about tight end Dustin Keller -- and he hears it from the receivers when they're not seeing the ball. He has to be part quarterback, part diplomat. "We're not in the business of keeping people smiling," Sanchez said. "We're in the business of winning." Even if it means running the ball all day. "Is that the quarterback's favorite game? No, probably not, but we win," Sanchez said. "When we get a chance to throw, you better throw it right. And when these guys get a chance to catch it, be at the right landmark and I'll hit them. And that's it. It's whatever it takes. I don't think anybody is upset about it." Sanchez and Holmes are the offensive captains. Actually, Holmes referred to Sanchez as a "general" -- is there a colonel in the house? -- praising his quarterback for being able to stroke the egos of his needy receivers. "You have two veteran guys that have been there, done that, and will complain a little bit about the ball," Holmes said, referring to himself and Burress, both of whom have Super Bowl-winning catches on their résumés. "There's a lot on [Sanchez's] plate, and he's doing a good job." On Sunday, the Jets should have some opportunities against the Buffalo Bills (5-2), ranked 24th in passing defense. The Bills have a league-high 18 interceptions, but their aggressive style sometimes backfires and leads to big pass plays. The Jets believe the Bills' defensive backs are vulnerable to double moves. Maybe, just maybe Holmes will have his bust-out game. "We have to follow our general -- Mark Sanchez -- and allow him to lead us up and down the field, hoping he doesn't make any mistakes," Holmes said.
the only really good thing about the Jet's "Dick" is that more than a million of us who read the Daily News on a daily basis don't have to endure seeing his hack "journalism" any more better that his crap is seen by those 22000 hits a day he gets at the almost unvisited espn local place he now is stuck at
just checked now with 20 comments (maybe a record for that unviewed dump our Dick works for now) he has one favorable supporter -- a Bills fan from Buffalo, of course. A couple of the commentors suggest a FIRE CIMINI site.... hopefully it gets set up so ALL Jet fans can add their support for this cause
how do you turn "we are winning ballgames right now" into that shit. Amazing how bad sportswriting is these days.
This article reminds me of some of my ex-girlfriends. Cimini is so intent on making an issue out of something that he's making a problem out of something that wasn't said. A real man would never even be able to twist Holmes' comments into a story like this. Maybe Cimini has one of those X-X-Y chromosome, hermaphrodite, things going on. :grin:
I don't like Cimini and think he's particularly weak at reporting any real news. But on the other hand I also think Holmes's low number of receptions is a story. How many of the homers here would have predicted before Opening Day that at this point Holmes would have only 22 catches? If a Pats fan or someone else came by here and made that prediction, I think several posters here would have had a shit hemorraghe. And Holmes (I think rightly) DID comment on the OL, so he clearly was unhappy with them. As he should have been at that point. But the real story is not the one Cimini implies but never really gets around to making, which is the implication that Holmes is unhappy. The real story is that the Jets are not getting him the ball, and why.
"Are you happy?" "Well, we're winning." WTF? What's between the lines of that statement? If anything it means he's content.
Cimini's articles are as factual as Bleacher Report articles. Doesn't reflect well on the integrity of Journalism when a clown like this can draw a consistent paycheck and draw so much attention.
Four words: New York Media Beast. I've lived all my life with muck-raking sports journalists trying to make a living in the cesspool that is the NY media culture. They all start out with an angle, smart, brash, witty, sometimes skill with numbers, and then veer straight to the negative end of the spectrum, because that's where all NY sports fans live after they've been exposed to the mismanagement that the big city churn creates over time. Steve Serby, Mark Cannizaro, Gary Myers, Mike Lupica, Rich Cimini, etc. They all start out with an interesting tale to tell of some sort and then they go straight to catering to the jaded, cynical NY sports fan because that's where the money is. The last guy to get out of NYC with his objectivity intact was Paul Zimmerman and that's because he has a great sense of humor and he got the hell out of the NY media culture before it destroyed his view on life. Reading Manish Mehta right now is a breath of fresh air but in a few years he's going to look just like one of the hacks above. Jaded, cynical and incapable of seeing the forest for the trees because the forest fire is all around him all the time.
is there a single Jet fan out there who really believes that Holmes is happy with 41 targets and 22 catches in 7 games?? I'll go on record as saying not a fucking chance in the world.