I for one like the divisions as they are now it promotes a common rivalry year to year instead of just playing some opponent. Conferences and rotating divisions do not provide this and, in my opinion, don't offer much positives that aren't covered in the divisional setup
Sounds good to me as Smizzy pulled a 180. I was just throwing that one out there as a response to his PM.
It would be good to break up the tougher confrences but keeping them together does promote rivaly. Either way is ok for me.
I am in another league who lets us keep 2 IDP for the price of 1 pick. So let's say I have 5 Offensive Keepers...the 6th can be used on 1 more offensive player...or 2 IDP's. This keeps a lot more offensive players from being kept each season.
I don't like that rule change at all, the one suggested by the email, it defeats the purpose of a keeper, now the good teams with multiple great players will be guaranteed to lose one of their best players, the teams lower in the league can catchup without in circumstance forcing the better teams to pray that their best talent isn't going away earlier, if you are going to do that there needs to be compensation for the team that loses their better players
