What do you think about Bob Suttons decision to play the prevent defense?

if there's a god....Sutton will be replaced by something more competent...like a coat rack or something.

 

I don't know what I think... hmmmmmmmmmmmm....

 

I think that you already know the answer to this question.

 

That was miserable but I think he shares the blame with Mangini. We should have kept attacking it was obviously working.

 

This is definetly a rhetorical question right?? I mean, is there ANYBODY that likes the prevent defense anymore besides Sutton??????

 

good answer :lol:


But the thought process needs to be: We are down by 4 pts all the time, no matter how much we are up by, we are down by 4 pts. Defenses that play like that win 10-12 games a year.

 

The "Prevent defense" is just a mystery to me. If your D scheme has shut the other team down for the entire game, why would you change that scheme in the last 2 minutes? I could never understand that thought process.

 

QFT'd for the great avatar + post combo.

 

Quoted for truthed...makes sense...lol.

 

I just hope we don't find out that Pollard was secretly in the Jets' payroll.

 

I think the prevent almost worked, he almost prevented the win.

 

you didn't see ted cottrell turn a san diego victory into a defeat.

good thing the jets bye week comes early this year, so sutton can take a refresher course.....

 

neither can sutton or cotrell......:shit:

 

Prevent D - prevents your team from winning.

*Source: Encyclopedia of Football, if such a thing exists*

 

We won, dude. Get over it...

In the meantime, do you want some cheese with that whine???

 

Didn't read the thread, but to answer the original question, I think it worked.