Except they will be in the hunt again this year and we won't. So how much farther forward did you mean?
I think it will be gradual, I think by the fourth season we should be beating them more than they beat us. But I also don't rule it out as happening sooner.
youre whole idea is conjecture and speculation....you dont have a leg to stand on. youll never win an arguement by saying "if you want to go by what theyve actually done, then im wrong, but if you look at what might happen, then im right". thats no kind of arguement, point, statement, or any other kind of anything! sure, marino could have won a SB...but he didnt....suck it up dude...you have no leg to stand on...
I know my post is based on speculation. I posted the reasons for the speculation in the first post. And (for the hundreth time) I acknowledged that BB had the better resume. So, if it makes you feel better to say that you are right bc you come to your speculation that BB will be better than EM based on what BB has already accomplished then fair enough. I know KOWIE, you have a hard on for being right in the thread. You want to base your speculation of the furture on what bb has done in the past. But the problem is that there is no crystal ball so you are not going to be able to declare a victory until we revisit this thread in a couple years. You base your speculation on the past. I base mine on the past too. My past is shorter than yours. It doesn't change that both opinions are speculative. So it is silly for you to come here and puff out your chest and try to claim a victory.
Main Entry: spec?u?la?tion Pronunciation: "spe-ky&-'lA-sh&n Function: noun : an act or instance of speculating : as a : assumption of unusual business risk in hopes of obtaining commensurate gain b : a transaction involving such speculation im not 'speculating' anything. today, right now BB is the better of the 2 coaches. again, i state for a FACT that nobody knows what will happen. EM could be great, or he could be a disaster. how exactly do you consider me saying that we wont know until we know speculation? it isnt close to what youre talking about. if you "base your speculation in the past", then, by using the ONLY data available for both coaches on an equal footing (being one year, last year) then EM would NEVER best BB. he would continually be second to him. which would obviously be the direct opposite of what youre saying. i dont have a hard on for being right, because i know how to, (if not always when) admit im wrong, or have made a mistake. (which you apparently cannot do). what gives me a big shiney purple boner are people who think they have the tea leaves read, make an outlandish statement and since they said it it has to be true, and then refuse to back down from it. you havent really had anyone agree with you, and have had some pretty reasonable people post some pretty decent reasons as to why they disagree, and then you reply with half assed comments like "if you want to base it off of what they did, then yeah, im wrong....but im right in the future". do you see how dumb that is? the fact that there are this many posts in response to this thread is the cold hard proof that its the offseason, and the draft cant come quick enough for us to talk about something concrete yet for the 07 season. for the love of god though....GIVE IT UP! :up:
If Bill Belichick retired tomorrow, and I had a choice of Romeo Crennel, Charlie Weis or Mangini?I?d take Romeo first and Charlie second. And this would be the order most Patriot fans would go also. I think you are so used to having horrible coaches you think this guy is the messiah
Do you see how dumb you are in trying to portray furture events as fact? It is impossible to say who is the better coach today. You can definately say who was the better coach in previous years. But you can't say who will preform better from this day forward. You will only know that after the games are played. And can you ease up on the all sexual innuendo, I am quite certain no one on the board wants to hear your rambling about about knobing and the details of your boners. It's queer.
i can see that pea brain is spent. i responded in kind to, when you said i get a hard on for being right (thats where talk of my purple shiny boner came from).... as for the first paragraph, you're repeating what i said to you,to me? why? trying to show you're not innately slow, just had one of those days? now, alls youll need is a spelling/grammar class, and you're set!
Nice edit work. If it makes you feel better to say I am repeating you, I can deal with that. Maybe in a couple years when your boner goes down we can revisit this. In any event I have always admired you avatar.
thanks for the avatar, but it isntactually "mine"....when i first joined i saw someone using it, and sent a PM asking if he would mind that i use it. he said cool, and so it goes....i love the hulk all hulked out with the helmet....