Mock 7.0 Fox Sports

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by NYJalltheway, Apr 10, 2006.

Page 1 of 2
  1. NYJalltheway

    NYJalltheway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,433
    Likes Received:
    2,520
    #1 NYJalltheway, Apr 10, 2006
  2. New York Mick

    New York Mick Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    About the only thing most people can agree on is that Bush is going #1 (who gets him at #1 is a debate).
     
    #2 New York Mick, Apr 10, 2006
  3. NYJalltheway

    NYJalltheway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,433
    Likes Received:
    2,520
    not really, the texans seem clear on taking him
     
    #3 NYJalltheway, Apr 10, 2006
  4. New York Mick

    New York Mick Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes but there are reports of them trading away the #1 pick. I dont think they will but its out there.
     
    #4 New York Mick, Apr 10, 2006
  5. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I really don't like the top half of that draft.

    Why would the Saints take Matt Leinart after signing Drew Brees?

    Where is Chad Greenway? I know he went 25, but IMO he should be gone before that.
     
    #5 PennyandtheJets, Apr 10, 2006
  6. McCluneNYJ

    McCluneNYJ Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    30
    I don't buy NO taking Leinart.

    No Way!
     
    #6 McCluneNYJ, Apr 10, 2006
  7. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    If the draft breaks down like that, no way can you take Ferguson with Mario on the board. But by the time we pick, I'm certain one of them will be off the board.
     
    #7 AMJets, Apr 10, 2006
  8. JetFanInPA

    JetFanInPA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,512
    Likes Received:
    4,252
    All I can say is... Wow. That might have been the worst mock I've seen in a LONG time.

    - So now New Orleans will have two QBs with contracts worth over $50million?
    - Buffalo with a TE? How about the explosive TE they drafted last year in the 3rd round, Kevin Everett?
    - Arizona has Darnell Dockett and Kendrick Clancy at DT.
    - Doubtful Green Bay takes a DE.

    Damn...
     
    #8 JetFanInPA, Apr 10, 2006
  9. Hazardous Waters

    Hazardous Waters Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who?
    (filler)
     
    #9 Hazardous Waters, Apr 10, 2006
  10. 1028

    1028 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    1
    What a freakin terrible mock
     
    #10 1028, Apr 10, 2006
  11. CmartinHOF

    CmartinHOF New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree with our first 2 picks...........but leinart with new orleans???? no way, they need to take someone they actually need!!
     
    #11 CmartinHOF, Apr 10, 2006
  12. hydro51

    hydro51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    still recovering from injury. your right though when he gets healthy he is gonna be hell of player for buffalo.
     
    #12 hydro51, Apr 10, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 11, 2005
  13. GeshJet

    GeshJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    84
    Makes no sense. NO taking Leinart - give me a break.
     
    #13 GeshJet, Apr 10, 2006
  14. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,968
    Likes Received:
    4,929
    I certainly don't want Lienert. But taking an OT with a #4 overall? Damn that,we need an offensive playmaker.
     
    #14 typeOnegative13NY, Apr 10, 2006
  15. Spike_D

    Spike_D Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    19
    You would see we do have playmakers ... if we had a line to give time for them to shine.
     
    #15 Spike_D, Apr 10, 2006
  16. ColezDeep!

    ColezDeep! New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think that Buffalo would pass on getting Ngata after losing all their run stuffers
     
    #16 ColezDeep!, Apr 10, 2006
  17. hydro51

    hydro51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think buffalo goes bunkley at the end of the day.
     
    #17 hydro51, Apr 10, 2006
  18. krd145

    krd145 New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    0
    i would prefer mcneil over mangold. mcneil at rt. aj at left.
     
    #18 krd145, Apr 10, 2006
  19. kinghenry89

    kinghenry89 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,052
    Likes Received:
    0
    But in the situation that we draft Ferguson with the #4, which is seeming more and more likely to me, we would probably try Adrian Jones at RT. Which would eliminate the need for another tackle at the #29.
     
    #19 kinghenry89, Apr 10, 2006
  20. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,968
    Likes Received:
    4,929
    That is true i guess,as long as Curtis steps back for Blaylock. But I still think we need to do what we can to get the RB of the future. If there was a way to get Bush...
     
    #20 typeOnegative13NY, Apr 10, 2006
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page